Jane VanDeBogart Action Fund

With a generous bequest from the estate of a long-time hospital merger activist, MergerWatch has created the Jane VanDeBogart Action Fund. This fund will enable us to better assist community-based activists. 

Find Out More

Site Search

MergerWatch in the News

The New York Times February 29, 2012: Women's Health Care at Risk

The Observer-Dispatch February 26, 2012: When secular, Catholic hospitals merge, questions are raised

The Baltimore Sun February 26, 2012: St Joseph considers merger with non-Catholic hospital system

The New Republic February 22, 2012: Unholy Alliance: Catholic health care controversy goes beyond birth control

The Nation Magazine February 17, 2012: Employees Need Birth Control Mandate

WNYC's Brian Lehrer Show February 14, 2012: Contraception Coverage in NY State

Modern Healthcare Magazine January 28, 2012: Business Conversion

Kaiser Health News January 23, 2012: In Quest to Grow, Catholic Hospital System Pares Religious Ties

Courier Journal January 16, 2012: Without Merger, Visions for University Hospital's Future Contrast

Courier Journal December 17, 2011: Documents on Directives Don't Satisfy Merger Critics

US News & World Report Best Hospitals 2012 Edition: Supersized Medicine

Courier Journal November 6, 2011: Merger Mania: Louisville Case Part of U.S. Surge

Seattle Times October 20, 2011: Swedish Abortion Decision an Insult

Courier Journal October 16, 2011: Hospital Merger May Cut Benefits

Courier Journal October 17, 2011: Altered Catholic Rules Pose Problems

Courier Journal September 8, 2011: Church-State Separation Seen as Issue in Hospital Merger

Republican American August 26, 2011: Abortion Foes Will Oppose Merger

Inside Higher Education August 9, 2011: Church, State and a University Hospital

Courier Journal July 23, 2011:University Hospital Merger Stirs End-of-Life Care Fears

WFPL News July 22, 2011: "Hospital Within A Hospital" Possible Solution for Healthcare Merger Concerns

Courier Journal June 12, 2011: Will Louisville Hospital Merger Mean Lost Services?

Ms. Magazine Spring 2011:
Treatment Denied

Women's Health Daily Report April 12, 2011: AZ Residents Celebrate End of Hospital Merger

Arizona Daily Star March 31, 2011: AZ Hospital, Catholic Health System End Agreement

Church & State March 2011: Prescription for Disaster: Catholic Bishops, Church Hospitals and Your Health Care

Washington Post January 20, 2011: Religious hospitals' restrictions sparking conflict, scrutiny

Religious Restrictions:
Hospital Care

Religiously-Sponsored Hospitals

Religiously-sponsored hospitals have long played an important role in the American health care system. Many of these hospitals were founded to serve the medical and spiritual needs of members of a particular faith, including patients and physicians who may have experienced discrimination at other hospitals.

SOURCE: Modern Healthcare's 2010 Hospital System Survey | Bonnie Berkowitz and Mary Kate Cannistra/The Washington Post - Jan. 20, 2011

Since the mid-20th century, however, religiously-sponsored hospitals have served an increasingly diverse population of patients and employ staff who often are not of the same faith as the hospital sponsors. Moreover, religious hospitals (especially Catholic facilities) have consolidated into large regional and national health systems that wield considerable market power and have been acquiring non-religious community hospitals. Four of the 10 largest health systems in the nation are now religiously-sponsored (three Catholic and one Adventist).

Because many religious hospitals continue to restrict the services they provide, based on doctrine, there is a growing conflict between these hospitals and the diverse communities they serve. Patients may have no other convenient choice for hospital care, or may be restricted in where they can seek care because of managed care rules requiring members to use “in-network” hospitals. Frequently patients only learn about restrictive care in a religious hospital once they are in need of such care. (Read about how the majority of Catholics feel about Catholic healthcare here.)

Religious restrictions can interfere with the doctor-patient relationship by effectively “gagging” the physician and preventing him/her from describing treatment options that are not permitted at the hospital. Moreover, physicians may be prohibited from providing disapproved services, even in cases of emergency, such as treatment of ectopic pregnancy or the offering of emergency contraception to rape victims.

Despite these restrictions on patients' access to case and clinicians' ability to provide needed services, religiously-sponsored hospitals continue to receive billions of public dollars each year through Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements and government grants. To learn more, see No Strings Attached: Public Funding of Religiously-Sponsored Hospitals in the United States.